One of the things that I finds that I
enjoy is the classic hypothetical situation. I enjoy thinking about
them, asking other people about them, conversing about them and
seeing what other people would do in or think about certain
situations. Little did I know however that hypothetical situations
actually have a term in social psychology.
Counterfactual thinking
is a term brought forward by Kahneman and Miller (1986). In
counterfactual thinking, people imagine alternate outcomes to
situations and events that did not happen. For example,
counterfactual thinking was probably performed by players from
Hendrix College after our lacrosse game. They may have imagined a
world in which they had actually won the game, and for the first time
ever had beaten Southwestern University in a lacrosse game. However,
this was not what happened (Hell yeah). When people imagine
situations where the outcome was better than what actually happened,
they were likely to feel regret and sad feelings (Roese, 1997; Roese
& Olson, 1995). Additionally, for players on the Southwestern
roster, the story was completely different. After crushing their most
hated opponent 12-6, players may have taken a moment to imagine a
scenario in which the tables were turned and Hendrix had pulled out a
victory for the first time ever. However, this exercise would elicit
a different response for the Southwestern players. The Southwestern
players would experience emotions of joy, satisfaction and relief,
especially since for the first time in program history we are 2-0 and
we kicked the crap out of our rival (Roese, 1997; Roese & Olson,
1995). Even though players on the awesome winning team may have
endulged in such thinking, Byrne
and McEleney (2000) found that people are more likely to engage in
counterfactual thinking when they experience a negative outcome as
opposed to a positive one when the negative outcome resulted from
actions we took. So a player from Hendrix who took multiple terrible
shots or gave up the ball to our defense was probably looking back at
the game and kicking themselves many times over because they may have
felt that their loss was due to their actions. Sucks to be that guy,
but I am a happy camper on the opposite end of that with a 12-6
victory and a hat-trick on the day.
Word Count: 381
References
Byrne,
R. M. J., & McEleney, A. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about
actions and failures to act. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
26,
1318-1331.
Kahneman,
D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its
alternatives. Psychological
Review, 93,136-153.
Roese,
N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological
Bulletin, 121, 133-148
Roese,
N. J., & Olson, J. M. (Eds). (1995). What
might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
No comments:
Post a Comment